Radical Centrism
Centrism taken to its limit: it refuses any leaning on principle and seeks exact equidistance between every pole, from economics to morality, treating each political axis as a balance point to be preserved.
Home / Ideologies / Radical Centrism
In one sentence
I want a society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally.
Political axes
Profile across the 12 cunnys
- Balanced
Balanced Structure
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.
- Balanced
Balanced Representation
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.
- Balanced
Balanced Power
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.
- Balanced
Balanced Immigration
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.
- Balanced
Balanced Diplomacy
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.
- Balanced
Balanced Intervention
Rationale
This synthetic catalogue position explicitly seeks equidistance on every axis. The intervention midpoint is a modeling convention rather than evidence of a particular military doctrine or foreign-policy practice.
- Balanced
Balanced Economy
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.
- Balanced
Balanced Control
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.
- Balanced
Balanced Trade
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.
- Balanced
Balanced Religion in governance
Rationale
This catalogue definition deliberately fixes every axis at an exact midpoint. Religious governance is therefore an explicit balancing convention of this synthetic model, not a historically documented constitutional doctrine.
- Balanced
Balanced Morality
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.
- Balanced
Balanced Technology
Rationale
Our Radical Centrism model centers on society that takes no side, power that never tilts toward any pole, and an economy weighing state and market exactly equally. That core does not specify the priority given to technological transformation versus ecological or bodily limits. Historical age, rural life and scientific reasoning do not by themselves establish acceptance or rejection of all technology.
What sets this ideology apart
Structure
Leans further toward federal than 62% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Ideology median 38This ideology 50
Of all the axes, Structure is where it stands furthest from the rest.
Immigration
On Immigration, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Ideology median 50This ideology 50
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.
Cunnys
Ui
Ui directs Trinity's Library Committee and spends much of her time among the old library's historical books. She finds ancient texts more comfortable company than most people and devotes herself to their curation, study, and preservation.
Closest, by dimension
PoliticallyNodokaSpec Ops No. 22788%
SociallyRenaOccult Society (Dormitory 4, Unit 404)90%
EconomicallyHasumiJustice Task Force95%
Other compatible profiles
PoliticsNagusaHyakkaryouran Resolution Council87%
PoliticsShichido YukinoFOX Squad leader86%
BusinessKotamaVeritas85%
Intellectual lifeEriOccult Society (Dormitory 4, Unit 404)85%
PhilosophyKikyouHyakkaryouran Resolution Council85%
PoliticsNoaSeminar83%
PoliticsNikoFOX Squad83%
PoliticsKisakiGenryumon83%
The most distant
Organizations
Trinity General School
AcademyA large academy formed from an alliance of schools and factions, with influential religious institutions and traditions of order and etiquette. Its principal factions share leadership through the Tea Party, while its students differ in their beliefs and attitudes.
Also close, by dimension
PoliticallyShanhaijing Senior Secondary SchoolAcademy83%
SociallyWildhunt Academy of ArtsAcademy80%
EconomicallyCleaning & ClearingSpecial operations organization89%
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Close ideologies
Closest within Center
- Center
Pragmatism
Political stance that judges proposals by the practical results they produce rather than fidelity to an ideological dogma, combining market measures, regulation, and social policy according to evidence and each problem's context.
- Center
Centrism
Political position that seeks balance between left and right, valuing moderation, pragmatism, and consensus, and combining elements of different currents to avoid extremes and favor gradual reforms.
- Center
Constitutional Monarchism
Defense of monarchy as a symbol of unity and continuity, with the king subject to the constitution and parliament, uniting tradition and institutional stability with representative democracy and the rule of law.
Closest in other spectrums
- Right
Right-Wing Pragmatism
Pragmatic branch that prioritizes fiscal adjustment, economic stability, and governability through broad coalitions, accepting market reforms and political concessions in the name of short- and medium-term results.
- Right
Secular Conservatism
Conservative branch that defends order, tradition, and institutions without grounding them in religion, supporting cultural values and social stability with secular, historical, and pragmatic arguments.
- Right
Conservatism
Political tradition that values order, customs, family, and consolidated institutions, preferring gradual and prudent change over rupture, based on historical experience and skepticism toward utopias.
The most distant ideology
Techno-CommunismAnarchist42%