Indigenism
Current that values indigenous peoples and their rights, defending autonomy, territory, culture, and political participation, along with development models and a plurinational state that respect their traditions.
Home / Ideologies / Indigenism
Current that values indigenous peoples and their rights, defending autonomy, territory, culture, and political participation, along with development models and a plurinational state that respect their traditions.
In one sentence
I want a plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation.
Political axes

Our Indigenism model centers on plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.

Our Indigenism definition includes “their full political participation”. The definition identifies popular authorization or a republican institution; the precise franchise and decision procedure remain separate questions.

Our Indigenism definition includes “current that values indigenous peoples and their rights”. Limits on authority and protected rights support a liberty reading, although legal order and defense remain possible.

Our Indigenism definition includes “plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples”. Recognized plural identities or equal membership bear on coexistence; imperial tolerance can still be administered unequally.

Our Indigenism model centers on plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.

Our Indigenism model centers on plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation. That core does not specify coercive foreign projection into other peoples or states. This axis concerns foreign intervention, not nationalism, domestic regulation, cultural confidence or military preparedness alone.

Our Indigenism model centers on plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

Our Indigenism model centers on plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.

Our Indigenism model centers on plurinational society that respects the territory, autonomy and traditions of indigenous peoples, with their full political participation. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.

Cultural autonomy and self-determination permit different relations between spiritual practice and collective rules. The retained coordinate models a particular community-public-order mixture; neither indigenous traditions nor Afro-Brazilian identity alone establishes religious government, and religious freedom is compatible with both belief and secular authority.

Our Indigenism definition includes “defending autonomy, territory, culture”. The approach to authority and inherited norms supplies moral context, but its relation to every contemporary social issue is interpretive.

Our Indigenism definition includes “political participation, along with development models and a plurinational state that respect their traditions”. Development or rational organization supplies indirect technological context; acceptance of transformative technology remains a modeled choice.

Leans further toward federal than 79% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Structure is where it stands furthest from the rest.

On Trade, it sits close to the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Hina leads Gehenna's Prefect Team with formidable competence and a strong sense of responsibility. She favors the Eden Treaty as a route to peace, reins in unauthorized incursions and protects students when threats arise, despite finding her endless duties exhausting.
Closest, by dimension
Other compatible profiles








The most distant
Gehenna's school food service prepares meals for its students. Fuuka and Juri contend with limited resources and the interruptions caused by the academy's unruly clubs.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Left
Current that fuses socialism and ecology, attributing the environmental crisis to capitalism and defending collective, sustainable, and democratic production that respects the limits of nature and social needs.
Movement that places unions and workers' organization at the center of politics, defending collective bargaining, direct action, and labor control over production as the path to working-class emancipation.
Current that attributes intrinsic value to all life and not only to human beings, defending a profound change of values, the reduction of human impact, and respect for the balance of the planet's ecosystems.
Closest in other spectrums
Neo-Zapatista movement that emerged in 1994 in southern Mexico, combining indigenous autonomy, direct democracy through assemblies and caracoles, cooperative subsistence economy, and refusal to seize state power, summed up as 'lead by obeying'.
Current that pursues socialism without an authoritarian state, uniting collective ownership and self-management with broad individual freedom, organized from the bottom up by free communities and workers.
Current that unites anarchism and radical ecology, defending decentralized, sustainable communities without a state or exploitation of nature, in harmony with ecological cycles and non-human life.
The most distant ideology
Authoritarian NeoliberalismRight22%