Home / Ideologies / Left Accelerationism
Current formulated by Srnicek and Williams that seeks to accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, advocating the end of work, universal basic income and shorter working hours toward a post-capitalism of abundance.
In one sentence
I want to accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance.
Political axes
Our Left Accelerationism model centers on accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.
Our Left Accelerationism model centers on accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.
Our Left Accelerationism model centers on accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.
Our Left Accelerationism definition includes “advocating the end of work, universal basic income and shorter working hours toward a post-capitalism of abundance”. The statement distinguishes membership and exclusion; rejecting the community's own assimilation is different from requiring minorities to assimilate.
Our Left Accelerationism model centers on accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.
Our Left Accelerationism model centers on accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance. That core does not specify coercive foreign projection into other peoples or states. This axis concerns foreign intervention, not nationalism, domestic regulation, cultural confidence or military preparedness alone.
Our Left Accelerationism definition includes “advocating the end of work, universal basic income and shorter working hours toward a post-capitalism of abundance”. The ownership that is retained or rejected matters; opposition to private property, monopoly or state ownership must not be read as endorsement of that institution.
Our Left Accelerationism model centers on accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.
Our Left Accelerationism definition includes “advocating the end of work, universal basic income and shorter working hours toward a post-capitalism of abundance”. The scope of the accepted or rejected exchange matters; opposition to globalism or foreign dependence is different from rejection of every form of trade.
Our Left Accelerationism model centers on accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.
Our Left Accelerationism model centers on accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left, abolishing work with universal basic income toward post-capitalist abundance. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.
Our Left Accelerationism definition includes “current formulated by Srnicek and Williams that seeks to accelerate automation and reclaim technology for the left”. Technology, industrial transformation or scientific organization is part of the stated project, while its ethical and ecological limits remain separate questions.
Leans further toward progressive than 91% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Morality is where it stands furthest from the rest.
On Structure, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.
Kei has obtained a body of her own after previously existing as an intelligence closely connected to Aris. Her guarded exterior struggles to conceal how pleased she is by this new freedom, and caring for Aris remains central to her life.
Closest, by dimension
Other compatible profiles
The most distant
The Independent Federal Investigation Club founded by the General Student Council President. Sensei helps students across academy boundaries, supports their decisions, and mediates disputes while responding to threats against them.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Left
Broad doctrine that advocates social or collective ownership of the means of production and economic planning to overcome capitalist exploitation, accepting both the revolutionary and the reformist road to get there.
Current that seeks to move beyond capitalism through elections, with social ownership of large firms, cooperatives and workplace democracy, rejecting both the vanguard party and mere social democratic management of the market.
Democratic Marxism inspired by Rosa Luxemburg, which unites revolution and freedom, values the spontaneity of the masses and the general strike, and criticizes both reformism and the authoritarian centralism of vanguard parties.
Closest in other spectrums
An anti-Leninist Marxist current of Pannekoek, Gorter and Mattick, which holds that workers themselves should run production and power through workers' councils, rejecting the vanguard party, the state and parliamentarism.
Nationalism based on citizenship and shared values rather than ethnicity, defining the nation by adherence to common laws and institutions, open to all who accept its democratic and civic principles.
Synthesis of anarchist currents centered on the liberation of body and identity, uniting the critique of patriarchy and of gender and sexuality norms with an openness to technology as a tool of emancipation, all under the rejection of the state, capitalism, and every imposed hierarchy.
The most distant ideology
FeudalismFar-Right24%