Home / Ideologies / Anarcho-Progressivism
Synthesis of anarchist currents centered on the liberation of body and identity, uniting the critique of patriarchy and of gender and sexuality norms with an openness to technology as a tool of emancipation, all under the rejection of the state, capitalism, and every imposed hierarchy.
In one sentence
I want a society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology.
Political axes
Our Anarcho-Progressivism definition includes “society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology”. This clause must be read for which central institutions it retains or rejects; opposition to a state or party is not endorsement of centralized territorial power.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism model centers on society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.
The definition rejects the state, capitalism and imposed hierarchies while defending emancipation of body and identity. That opposition to coercive authority supports the liberty direction; the rejected hierarchy is not evidence for security-oriented social control.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism model centers on society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism model centers on society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism model centers on society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology. That core does not specify coercive foreign projection into other peoples or states. This axis concerns foreign intervention, not nationalism, domestic regulation, cultural confidence or military preparedness alone.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism definition includes “synthesis of anarchist currents centered on the liberation of body and identity, uniting the critique of patriarchy and of gender and sexuality norms with an openness to technology as a tool of emancipation, all under the rejection of the state, capitalism”. The ownership that is retained or rejected matters; opposition to private property, monopoly or state ownership must not be read as endorsement of that institution.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism model centers on society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism model centers on society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism model centers on society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism definition includes “society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology”. The stance toward inherited or reformist customs matters; a critique of tradition or rejection of cultural progressivism is not an endorsement of the position being rejected.
Our Anarcho-Progressivism definition includes “society without state, capital or hierarchy, freeing body and identity from patriarchy through emancipatory technology”. The accepted or rejected technological transformation matters; criticism of industrialization or limits on enhancement is not endorsement of unrestricted technological change.
Leans further toward progressive than 100% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Morality is where it stands furthest from the rest.
On Control, it sits close to the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.
Kei has obtained a body of her own after previously existing as an intelligence closely connected to Aris. Her guarded exterior struggles to conceal how pleased she is by this new freedom, and caring for Aris remains central to her life.
Closest, by dimension
Other compatible profiles
The most distant
One of Kivotos's largest academies, known for freedom, disorder, and a long rivalry with Trinity. The Pandemonium Society formally governs it while the Prefect Team struggles to maintain order.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Anarchist
Philosophy that rejects the state and all coercive authority, defending the free organization of society through voluntary associations, cooperation, and self-management, with freedom and equality as central values.
Left-libertarian branch that unites broad individual freedom with collective or shared ownership of resources, defending autonomy, cooperation, and the rejection of both the authoritarian state and capital.
Current that pursues socialism without an authoritarian state, uniting collective ownership and self-management with broad individual freedom, organized from the bottom up by free communities and workers.
Closest in other spectrums
An anti-Leninist Marxist current of Pannekoek, Gorter and Mattick, which holds that workers themselves should run production and power through workers' councils, rejecting the vanguard party, the state and parliamentarism.
Democratic Marxism inspired by Rosa Luxemburg, which unites revolution and freedom, values the spontaneity of the masses and the general strike, and criticizes both reformism and the authoritarian centralism of vanguard parties.
Movement that places unions and workers' organization at the center of politics, defending collective bargaining, direct action, and labor control over production as the path to working-class emancipation.
The most distant ideology
ReactionaryismFar-Right29%