Home / Ideologies / Liberal Developmentalism
The East Asian Tiger model (Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong): champions free markets, foreign trade and private enterprise as engines of growth, paired with an active technocratic state that plans infrastructure, education and strategic industrialization, stopping short of closed protectionism or hard authoritarian control.
In one sentence
I want free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education.
Political axes
Our Liberal Developmentalism model centers on free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.
Our Liberal Developmentalism definition includes “the East Asian Tiger model (Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong): champions free markets, foreign trade and private enterprise as engines of growth, paired with an active technocratic state that plans infrastructure, education and strategic industrialization, stopping short of closed protectionism or hard authoritarian control”. The stance toward party dictatorship or unelected leadership bears directly on electoral replacement; endorsement and rejection of those forms imply different directions.
Our Liberal Developmentalism model centers on free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.
Our Liberal Developmentalism model centers on free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.
Our Liberal Developmentalism model centers on free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.
Our Liberal Developmentalism model centers on free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education. That core does not specify coercive foreign projection into other peoples or states. This axis concerns foreign intervention, not nationalism, domestic regulation, cultural confidence or military preparedness alone.
Our Liberal Developmentalism definition includes “the East Asian Tiger model (Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong): champions free markets, foreign trade and private enterprise as engines of growth, paired with an active technocratic state that plans infrastructure, education and strategic industrialization, stopping short of closed protectionism or hard authoritarian control”. Private enterprise or distributed productive property bears on ownership; regulation and public services can coexist with it.
Our Liberal Developmentalism definition includes “free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education”. Decentralized exchange and competition bear on market coordination; they need not imply unrestricted private ownership.
Our Liberal Developmentalism definition includes “the East Asian Tiger model (Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong): champions free markets, foreign trade and private enterprise as engines of growth, paired with an active technocratic state that plans infrastructure, education and strategic industrialization, stopping short of closed protectionism or hard authoritarian control”. Tariffs, self-reliance or protected production bear on barriers to cross-border economic integration.
Our Liberal Developmentalism model centers on free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.
Our Liberal Developmentalism model centers on free markets and foreign trade as engines of growth, guided by a technocratic state that plans infrastructure and education. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.
Our Liberal Developmentalism definition includes “the East Asian Tiger model (Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong): champions free markets, foreign trade and private enterprise as engines of growth, paired with an active technocratic state that plans infrastructure, education and strategic industrialization, stopping short of closed protectionism or hard authoritarian control”. Technology, industrial transformation or scientific organization is part of the stated project, while its ethical and ecological limits remain separate questions.
Leans further toward globalism than 80% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Trade is where it stands furthest from the rest.
On Morality, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.
Aoba works as an engineer in Highlander Railroad Academy's Freight Logistics Department. Quiet in company but pointed in her muttered complaints, she struggles with excessive work and treatment she considers unfair.
Closest, by dimension
Other compatible profiles
The most distant
Aru's Gehenna odd-jobs agency takes on fixer contracts across Kivotos. Its ambitions to act like a formidable outlaw organization are repeatedly complicated by mishaps and the members' loyalties.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Center
Centrist branch that combines economic moderation and institutional respect with social conservatism, valuing family, religion, order, and gradual change without joining the authoritarian right or populist radicalism.
Pro-market centrist branch that combines fiscal responsibility, liberal democracy, moderate international openness, and institutional reform, rejecting both broad statism and libertarian radicalism as a political program.
Political stance that judges proposals by the practical results they produce rather than fidelity to an ideological dogma, combining market measures, regulation, and social policy according to evidence and each problem's context.
Closest in other spectrums
Pragmatic branch that prioritizes fiscal adjustment, economic stability, and governability through broad coalitions, accepting market reforms and political concessions in the name of short- and medium-term results.
Geopolitical doctrine of the alliance between the US, Canada and Europe around NATO and the EU, which backs the alliance's eastward expansion and the use of Western military power to spread liberal democracy and free markets against Russia and China.
Synthesis that unites free markets and economic freedoms with the appreciation of tradition, order, and institutions, defending prudent change and social stability within the framework of liberal democracy.
The most distant ideology
CommunalismAnarchist33%