Social-Developmentalism
Model associated with Brazil's Workers' Party governments that seeks growth with social inclusion, combining rising minimum wages, popular credit, cash transfers and public banks without breaking with the market.
Home / Ideologies / Social-Developmentalism
Model associated with Brazil's Workers' Party governments that seeks growth with social inclusion, combining rising minimum wages, popular credit, cash transfers and public banks without breaking with the market.
In one sentence
I want growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place.
Political axes

Our Social-Developmentalism model centers on growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.

Our Social-Developmentalism model centers on growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.


Our Social-Developmentalism model centers on growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.

Our Social-Developmentalism model centers on growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.

Our Social-Developmentalism model centers on growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.

Our Social-Developmentalism definition includes “rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place”. International engagement or military capacity is relevant context, but neither an alliance nor preparedness automatically establishes coercive intervention.

Our Social-Developmentalism definition includes “rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place”. The stated economic mix gives ownership context, but redistribution or management alone does not fix the public/private division.

Our Social-Developmentalism definition includes “rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place”. State coordination, regulation or expert direction qualifies market allocation; technical knowledge alone does not require comprehensive planning.

Our Social-Developmentalism model centers on growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.


Our Social-Developmentalism model centers on growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.

Our Social-Developmentalism model centers on growth that shares income, with rising minimum wages, credit and public banks, broad alliances and the market kept in place. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.

Our Social-Developmentalism definition includes “growth that shares income”. Development or rational organization supplies indirect technological context; acceptance of transformative technology remains a modeled choice.

Leans further toward multiculturalism than 72% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Immigration is where it stands furthest from the rest.

On Technology, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Miyako leads SRT's RABBIT Squad as RABBIT 1 and joined the academy because she admired its commitment to justice. Its closure left her and her teammates living in a park, where her terse manner can conceal how deeply she cares for the others.
Closest, by dimension



Other compatible profiles








The most distant
Gehenna's school food service prepares meals for its students. Fuuka and Juri contend with limited resources and the interruptions caused by the academy's unruly clubs.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Left
Branch that seeks concrete social results by negotiating with the market and existing institutions, prioritizing responsible fiscal austerity, targeted social policy, and governability over revolutionary ideological purity.
Current that mobilizes the people against economic elites, defending redistribution, public control, national sovereignty, plebiscitary democracy, and broad social policy in popular anti-establishment language.
System in which collectively or publicly owned enterprises compete in markets, uniting the efficiency of competition with the socialist distribution of profits, without the rigid central planning of state economies.
Closest in other spectrums
Nationalism based on citizenship and shared values rather than ethnicity, defining the nation by adherence to common laws and institutions, open to all who accept its democratic and civic principles.
Current that advocates industrialization, national sovereignty, and strategic state planning, seeking to modernize the economy through public investment, productive protection, and coordination between government, science, and national companies.
Centrist branch that accepts the market economy but prioritizes social protection, public services, gradual reforms, and institutional consensus to reduce inequality without political rupture or permanent polarization.
The most distant ideology
FeudalismFar-Right34%