Bioconservatism
Position that opposes genetic manipulation and the technological enhancement of the human body, defending ethical limits on science in the name of dignity, human nature, and prudence toward the future.
Home / Ideologies / Bioconservatism
Position that opposes genetic manipulation and the technological enhancement of the human body, defending ethical limits on science in the name of dignity, human nature, and prudence toward the future.
In one sentence
I want a society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science.
Political axes


Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.

Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.


Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.


Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.

Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.

Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify coercive foreign projection into other peoples or states. This axis concerns foreign intervention, not nationalism, domestic regulation, cultural confidence or military preparedness alone.

Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.


Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.

Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.


Our Bioconservatism definition includes “defending ethical limits on science in the name of dignity, human nature”. Reason, rights or criticism of religion offers context for public justification, but does not alone settle the institutional relation between religion and governance.

Our Bioconservatism model centers on society that draws ethical limits on genetic manipulation and body enhancement, protecting human dignity in the face of science. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.

Limits on genetic manipulation and bodily enhancement are the defining claim. The biology direction concerns ethical restraint on transformation of human nature, not a blanket rejection of medicine, engineering or all scientific inquiry.

Leans further toward biology than 97% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Technology is where it stands furthest from the rest.

On Trade, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Chinatsu provides medical support for Gehenna's Prefect Team and often supplies the judgment its more zealous members lack. Her stern manner hides a gentle affection for animals, and she is willing to rein in Ako and Iori when their enforcement goes too far.
Closest, by dimension



Other compatible profiles








The most distant
One of Trinity's principal factions and a successor to a founding academy. Nagisa represents it in the Tea Party and leads preparations for the Eden Treaty, while navigating factional distrust and the aftermath of the crisis.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Center
Current that values community bonds, traditions, and the common good above individualism, holding that justice and identity arise from life in community and the responsibilities people share.
Current that links environmental protection to national sovereignty, prioritizing the protection of the country's own natural resources and land and sustainable development within national borders.
Socrates' dialectical method, examining beliefs through rational questioning and the pursuit of virtue, distrustful of mass politics and the rhetoric of demagogues, yet respectful of the city's rule of law.
Closest in other spectrums
Branch that unites conservatism and environmental protection, defending the preservation of nature as part of the tradition and heritage to be passed on to future generations, with prudence toward change.
Conservative tradition that accepts social reforms and protection for the poorest to preserve national cohesion, seeing elites as responsible for the people's welfare and for harmony between classes.
Movement dedicated to protecting the environment and the sustainable use of resources, advocating policies against pollution and climate change and harmony between human development and ecological balance.
The most distant ideology
Techno-MonarchismRight38%