Corporatism

Political axes

Profile across the 12 cunnys

• 

  Structure

  Strong · Unitary
  Federal16%

  Unitary84%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.

• 

  Representation

  Strong · Autocracy
  Democracy23%

  Autocracy77%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.

• 

  Power

  Strong · Security
  Security74%

  Liberty26%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.

• 

  Immigration

  Strong · Assimilation
  Assimilation74%

  Multiculturalism26%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.

• 

  Diplomacy

  Leaning · Militarist
  Militarist64%

  Pacifist36%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.

• 

  Intervention

  Leaning · Interventionist
  Non-interventionist35%

  Interventionist65%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify coercive foreign projection into other peoples or states. This axis concerns foreign intervention, not nationalism, domestic regulation, cultural confidence or military preparedness alone.

• 

  Economy

  Leaning · Public
  Public61%

  Private39%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

• 

  Control

  Strong · Planning
  Planning73%

  Free market27%
  Rationale

  Employers and workers are organized into state-integrated corporations for directed cooperation instead of free competition. This supports a coordinated planning-side model, while corporatist bargaining is not necessarily comprehensive central planning or public ownership.

• 

  Trade

  Strong · Protectionism
  Protectionism78%

  Globalism22%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.

• 

  Religion in governance

  Strong · Religious governance
  Secular governance19%

  Religious governance81%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.

• 

  Morality

  Strong · Traditionalist
  Progressive24%

  Traditionalist76%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.

• 

  Technology

  Balanced
  Technology53%

  Biology47%
  Rationale

  Our Corporatism model centers on society organized into corporations of employers and workers integrated into the state, in directed harmony between the classes. That core does not specify the priority given to technological transformation versus ecological or bodily limits. Historical age, rural life and scientific reasoning do not by themselves establish acceptance or rejection of all technology.

What sets this ideology apart

Most unusual position

Religion in governance

Leans further toward religious governance than 83% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.

Ideology median 59This ideology 19

Of all the axes, Religion in governance is where it stands furthest from the rest.

Most common position

Economy

On Economy, it sits practically at the catalog median.

Ideology median 58This ideology 61

Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Cunnys

Featured representative82% match

Yuuka

SeminarMillennium Science School

Yuuka serves as Seminar's treasurer and manages Millennium's budget with exceptional mathematical ability. She often returns to her abacus when emotions or difficult decisions disrupt the orderly reasoning she prefers.

Closest, by dimension

• 
  PoliticallyKaguyaPeking Opera Club president
  97%
• 
  SociallyHasumiJustice Task Force
  93%
• 
  EconomicallyArisGame Development Department
  100%

Other compatible profiles

• 
  PoliticsCherinoRed Winter Office93%
• 
  PoliticsShiranui KayaDefense office chief87%
• 
  PoliticsMarinaRed Winter Office86%
• 
  PoliticsMinaGenryumon82%
• 
  PhilosophyKikyouHyakkaryouran Resolution Council81%
• 
  EconomicsOki AoiFinance officer81%
• 
  PoliticsBeatriceGematria researcher80%
• 
  PoliticsRioFormer Seminar president80%

The most distant

• KiraraTwinkle Twinkle Club
  31%
• RumiBlack Tortoise Promenade
  33%
• MeruKnowledge Liberation Front
  33%

Organizations

Most compatible organization97% match

Pater Faction

School faction

One of Trinity's principal factions and a successor to a founding academy. During the Eden Treaty crisis its members demand martial law and detain rivals; Mika's former leadership and later probation form part of its changing political history.

Also close, by dimension

• 
  PoliticallySRT Special AcademyAcademy
  92%
• 
  SociallyHyakkaryouran Resolution CouncilConflict mediation council
  97%
• 
  EconomicallyCleaning & ClearingSpecial operations organization
  100%

The most distant

• Knowledge Liberation FrontLiterary organization
  30%
• Black Tortoise PromenadeMerchant association
  34%
• Gehenna AcademyAcademy
  36%

Ideological proximity

Close ideologies

Closest within Third Position

• Third Position

  Peronist Nationalism

  Justicialist doctrine of Juan and Eva Perón uniting political sovereignty, economic independence and social justice, with CGT unions, nationalizations, protected industrialization, social Catholicism and a charismatic leader above parties.

• Third Position

  Brazilian Integralism

  Authoritarian nationalist movement that emerged in 1930s Brazil, with a Christian and corporatist base, the motto God, Fatherland and Family, mass aesthetics, and frontal opposition to liberalism and communism.

• Third Position

  National Syndicalism

  Nationalist and syndicalist current that rejects liberalism and Marxism, advocating national unity, corporatist organization of labor, authoritarian social justice, and popular mobilization around the state.

Closest in other spectrums

• Far-Right

  Christian Theocratism

  Christian theocratist doctrine that subordinates political power to religious authority, holding that divine law and the Church should govern the state and customs, from medieval and papal ultramontanism to modern reconstructionist projects.

• Right

  Right-Wing Populism

  Current that mobilizes the people against political and cultural elites, combining nationalism, immigration restriction, traditional values, public religion, strong security, and anti-establishment economic pragmatism around personalist leaders.

• Far-Right

  National Capitalism

  System that unites free enterprise with strong protectionism and state direction, prioritizing industry, jobs, and national sovereignty over global free trade and unchecked foreign capital.

The most distant ideology