Home / Ideologies / Imperialism
Doctrine that advocates the territorial, military, and economic expansion of a nation over other peoples and territories, subordinating colonies and spheres of influence to the interests of the metropole through force and political domination.
In one sentence
I want a metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests.
Political axes
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.
Our Imperialism definition includes “metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests”. Compulsion, surveillance or enforced discipline is relevant to the security side independently of election rules.
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.
Our Imperialism definition includes “doctrine that advocates the territorial, military”. Organized force, military command or acceptance of war bears on militarism; domestic revolt and foreign war are not identical.
Territorial conquest or subordination of other peoples is explicit in the definition. The interventionist direction follows foreign domination, even where conquered communities retain autonomy or receive religious tolerance; pluralism within an empire does not remove external coercion.
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.
Our Imperialism model centers on metropole that expands its territory and subjugates colonies by force, subordinating conquered peoples to the dominant nation's interests. That core does not specify the priority given to technological transformation versus ecological or bodily limits. Historical age, rural life and scientific reasoning do not by themselves establish acceptance or rejection of all technology.
Leans further toward militarist than 96% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Diplomacy is where it stands furthest from the rest.
On Control, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.
The Kaiser President leads Kaiser Corporation, whose businesses and armed subsidiaries exert influence across Kivotos. The corporation's pursuit of land, contracts, and profit repeatedly places it in conflict with the students and Schale.
Closest, by dimension
Other compatible profiles
The most distant
The elite SRT unit led by Yukino allies with Kaya after the academy's closure, accepting coercive missions and a station-bombing plan in exchange for its restoration. Confronted by Sensei and RABBIT, its members abandon the bombing and surrender; this profile concerns their coup-era choices.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Far-Right
Regime centered on the armed forces as the core of political power, ruled by a military junta or command hierarchy, marked by centralization, discipline, a cult of order, and expansionism, subordinating civilian politics to military command.
System that unites free enterprise with strong protectionism and state direction, prioritizing industry, jobs, and national sovereignty over global free trade and unchecked foreign capital.
Current that preserves order, tradition, and hierarchy through a strong state, restricting freedoms and political participation in the name of social stability, morality, religion, and established authority.
Closest in other spectrums
Caesarist current that legitimises a charismatic leader by plebiscite above parties, combining personal authority, bureaucratic centralisation, military mobilisation and state-led modernising reforms.
Nationalist and syndicalist current that rejects liberalism and Marxism, advocating national unity, corporatist organization of labor, authoritarian social justice, and popular mobilization around the state.
Authoritarian nationalist movement that emerged in 1930s Brazil, with a Christian and corporatist base, the motto God, Fatherland and Family, mass aesthetics, and frontal opposition to liberalism and communism.
The most distant ideology
GeoanarchismAnarchist22%