Home / Ideologies / Liberal Technocracy
Synthesis of the Asian Tigers: entrusts government to a merit-recruited technical elite insulated from the vote and guided by results rather than doctrine, combining free trade, open markets and low taxation with strict public order and state planning where it proves effective.
In one sentence
I want a government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine.
Political axes
Our Liberal Technocracy model centers on government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.
Our Liberal Technocracy definition includes “government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine”. The clause specifies a stance toward political authorization; an absent or rejected franchise, parliament or party is not evidence that the model endorses that institution.
Our Liberal Technocracy definition includes “combining free trade, open markets and low taxation with strict public order and state planning where it proves effective”. Compulsion, surveillance or enforced discipline is relevant to the security side independently of election rules.
Our Liberal Technocracy model centers on government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.
Our Liberal Technocracy model centers on government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.
Our Liberal Technocracy model centers on government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine. That core does not specify coercive foreign projection into other peoples or states. This axis concerns foreign intervention, not nationalism, domestic regulation, cultural confidence or military preparedness alone.
Our Liberal Technocracy model centers on government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.
Our Liberal Technocracy definition includes “combining free trade, open markets and low taxation with strict public order and state planning where it proves effective”. Decentralized exchange and competition bear on market coordination; they need not imply unrestricted private ownership.
Our Liberal Technocracy definition includes “combining free trade, open markets and low taxation with strict public order and state planning where it proves effective”. The definition explicitly addresses international exchange or capital access, separate from domestic market rules.
Our Liberal Technocracy definition includes “government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine”. The role that religion is assigned or denied in public rules matters; rejection of faith or clergy is not evidence of religious governance, and spiritual identity alone does not establish it.
Our Liberal Technocracy model centers on government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.
Our Liberal Technocracy model centers on government of a merit-recruited technical elite, insulated from the popular vote, guiding free trade and public order by results, not doctrine. That core does not specify the priority given to technological transformation versus ecological or bodily limits. Historical age, rural life and scientific reasoning do not by themselves establish acceptance or rejection of all technology.
Leans further toward globalism than 89% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Trade is where it stands furthest from the rest.
On Intervention, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.
Kikyou directs operations and strategy for the Hyakkaryouran Resolution Council. Her calculated approach can be merciless toward opponents, but she refuses to treat an ally's safety as an acceptable price for victory.
Closest, by dimension
Other compatible profiles
The most distant
Trinity's main security and disciplinary force is led by Tsurugi, with Hasumi handling much of its daily work. Its members maintain order across the academy and its district.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Right
Pragmatic branch that prioritizes fiscal adjustment, economic stability, and governability through broad coalitions, accepting market reforms and political concessions in the name of short- and medium-term results.
A doctrine of Curtis Yarvin that proposes running the state as a joint-stock company: shareholders, a sovereign CEO, citizens as customers who can leave, guaranteed private property and politics replaced by management.
Current that combines a market economy, private property, trade openness, and technocracy with low democratic participation, holding that a strong, efficient state should preserve order, stability, and growth.
Closest in other spectrums
Pragmatic reform initiated by Deng Xiaoping that introduced markets, private property, and economic opening under the absolute control of the Communist Party, forming the model of socialism with Chinese characteristics.
The East Asian Tiger model (Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong): champions free markets, foreign trade and private enterprise as engines of growth, paired with an active technocratic state that plans infrastructure, education and strategic industrialization, stopping short of closed protectionism or hard authoritarian control.
1990s renewal of the center-left under Blair, Clinton and Giddens that accepts globalized markets and fiscal discipline, replaces welfare with work activation, is tough on crime and backs liberal interventions.
The most distant ideology
CommunalismAnarchist23%