Municipalism
A world divided into independent city-states and microstates that compete like a market, with free secession, the right of exit and political experimentation, from the medieval free cities to Yarvin's "patchwork" and seasteading.
Home / Ideologies / Municipalism
A world divided into independent city-states and microstates that compete like a market, with free secession, the right of exit and political experimentation, from the medieval free cities to Yarvin's "patchwork" and seasteading.
In one sentence
I want thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws.
Political axes

Our Municipalism definition includes “a world divided into independent city-states and microstates that compete like a market”. Territorial autonomy, confederation or jurisdictional competition bears directly on where public decisions reside.

Our Municipalism model centers on thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.

Our Municipalism model centers on thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.

Our Municipalism model centers on thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.

Our Municipalism model centers on thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.

Corporate sovereignty, exit, jurisdictional competition or technological acceleration does not itself endorse foreign military projection. The retained coordinate models a chosen geopolitical variant; a rejection of democracy or an emphasis on profit is not independent evidence for aggression.

Our Municipalism model centers on thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

Our Municipalism definition includes “thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents”. Decentralized exchange and competition bear on market coordination; they need not imply unrestricted private ownership.

Our Municipalism definition includes “a world divided into independent city-states and microstates that compete like a market”. Cross-border cooperation or networks supplies an international horizon; it does not by itself prescribe a trade treaty or tariff schedule.


Our Municipalism model centers on thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.

Our Municipalism model centers on thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.

Our Municipalism model centers on thousands of sovereign city-states competing for residents, with free secession, the right of exit and each city choosing its own laws. That core does not specify the priority given to technological transformation versus ecological or bodily limits. Historical age, rural life and scientific reasoning do not by themselves establish acceptance or rejection of all technology.

Leans further toward federal than 96% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Structure is where it stands furthest from the rest.


On Religion in governance, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Yakumo leads Red Winter's Publishing Department and edits its Red Bear magazine. Tenacious and calculating about the club's profits, she will pursue a plan relentlessly, though her businesslike exterior also conceals a gentler side.
Closest, by dimension



Other compatible profiles








The most distant
Red Winter's publishing club runs the Red Bear newspaper and commercial publishing work. Yakumo and Takane promote and distribute authors' works through profit-sharing contracts, including bringing Red Winter literature to Trinity.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Libertarian
A neoreactionary current that rejects democracy in favor of microstates run like firms. It favors competition among jurisdictions, free markets, the right of exit, and technological innovation as principles of government.
Current that sees monarchy as a guarantee of freedom and stability, defending a king with limited power who protects property and individual rights and maintains a lean, minimally interventionist state.
Libertarian branch that defends a minimal state limited to police, courts, and defense, leaving everything else to the market and private initiative, to protect individual rights without oppressing freedom.
Closest in other spectrums
Economic system based on private property, free markets, and the pursuit of profit, in which production and prices are regulated by competition and supply and demand, with individual initiative as its engine.
Political tradition that places individual freedom at the center, defending rights, tolerance, the rule of law, a market economy, and limits on power, with government subject to the consent of citizens.
Current that advocates free markets, deregulation, privatization, and fiscal discipline, reducing the state's economic role and trusting competition and monetary stability as engines of prosperity.
The most distant ideology
ReactionaryismFar-Right28%