Techno-Commercialism
A neoreactionary current that rejects democracy in favor of microstates run like firms. It favors competition among jurisdictions, free markets, the right of exit, and technological innovation as principles of government.
Home / Ideologies / Techno-Commercialism
A neoreactionary current that rejects democracy in favor of microstates run like firms. It favors competition among jurisdictions, free markets, the right of exit, and technological innovation as principles of government.
In one sentence
I want competing corporate cities run by shareholders, with freedom to exit and markets and technology rewarding efficiency.
Political axes

Our Techno-Commercialism definition includes “a neoreactionary current that rejects democracy in favor of microstates run like firms”. This clause must be read for which central institutions it retains or rejects; opposition to a state or party is not endorsement of centralized territorial power.

Our Techno-Commercialism definition includes “a neoreactionary current that rejects democracy in favor of microstates run like firms”. The clause specifies a stance toward political authorization; an absent or rejected franchise, parliament or party is not evidence that the model endorses that institution.

Our Techno-Commercialism model centers on competing corporate cities run by shareholders, with freedom to exit and markets and technology rewarding efficiency. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.

Our Techno-Commercialism model centers on competing corporate cities run by shareholders, with freedom to exit and markets and technology rewarding efficiency. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.


Our Techno-Commercialism model centers on competing corporate cities run by shareholders, with freedom to exit and markets and technology rewarding efficiency. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.

Corporate sovereignty, exit, jurisdictional competition or technological acceleration does not itself endorse foreign military projection. The retained coordinate models a chosen geopolitical variant; a rejection of democracy or an emphasis on profit is not independent evidence for aggression.

Our Techno-Commercialism model centers on competing corporate cities run by shareholders, with freedom to exit and markets and technology rewarding efficiency. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

Our Techno-Commercialism definition includes “competing corporate cities run by shareholders”. Decentralized exchange and competition bear on market coordination; they need not imply unrestricted private ownership.

Our Techno-Commercialism model centers on competing corporate cities run by shareholders, with freedom to exit and markets and technology rewarding efficiency. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.

Corporate sovereignty, managerial competence or exit supplies the stated institutional core. Criticism of the academic-media Cathedral is not a claim for clerical government; the retained secular or mixed coordinate is a catalogue variant because these texts do not uniquely settle religion's public authority.


Our Techno-Commercialism model centers on competing corporate cities run by shareholders, with freedom to exit and markets and technology rewarding efficiency. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.

Our Techno-Commercialism definition includes “technological innovation as principles of government”. Technology, industrial transformation or scientific organization is part of the stated project, while its ethical and ecological limits remain separate questions.

Leans further toward federal than 94% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Structure is where it stands furthest from the rest.


On Diplomacy, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Saya is a precocious researcher with an extraordinary academic record and a reputation for disruptive experiments. Her rat companion, Nezusuke, has been with her since childhood and is someone she regards as family.
Closest, by dimension



Other compatible profiles








The most distant
Aru's Gehenna odd-jobs agency takes on fixer contracts across Kivotos. Its ambitions to act like a formidable outlaw organization are repeatedly complicated by mishaps and the members' loyalties.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Libertarian
A world divided into independent city-states and microstates that compete like a market, with free secession, the right of exit and political experimentation, from the medieval free cities to Yarvin's "patchwork" and seasteading.
Current that sees monarchy as a guarantee of freedom and stability, defending a king with limited power who protects property and individual rights and maintains a lean, minimally interventionist state.
Libertarian branch that defends a minimal state limited to police, courts, and defense, leaving everything else to the market and private initiative, to protect individual rights without oppressing freedom.
Closest in other spectrums
Economic system based on private property, free markets, and the pursuit of profit, in which production and prices are regulated by competition and supply and demand, with individual initiative as its engine.
Current that advocates free markets, deregulation, privatization, and fiscal discipline, reducing the state's economic role and trusting competition and monetary stability as engines of prosperity.
Dynastic microstate model that trades political sovereignty for prosperity: a hereditary prince with real power, minimal taxation, secrecy and financial services as the revenue base, openness to foreign capital and residents, and no standing army.
The most distant ideology
Fourth Political TheoryThird Position34%