Dark Enlightenment
A intellectual current of Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin that attacks democracy, egalitarianism and the academic-media "Cathedral", defends autocratic government and exit, and harbors strands of race realism and accelerationism.
Home / Ideologies / Dark Enlightenment
A intellectual current of Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin that attacks democracy, egalitarianism and the academic-media "Cathedral", defends autocratic government and exit, and harbors strands of race realism and accelerationism.
In one sentence
I want to replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral.
Political axes

Our Dark Enlightenment definition includes “replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral”. This clause must be read for which central institutions it retains or rejects; opposition to a state or party is not endorsement of centralized territorial power.

Our Dark Enlightenment definition includes “a intellectual current of Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin that attacks democracy, egalitarianism and the academic-media "Cathedral", defends autocratic government and exit”. The stance toward party dictatorship or unelected leadership bears directly on electoral replacement; endorsement and rejection of those forms imply different directions.


Our Dark Enlightenment definition includes “replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral”. The target of restraint or opposition matters: rejecting hierarchy or compulsion is different from endorsing security-oriented control.

Our Dark Enlightenment model centers on replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.

Our Dark Enlightenment model centers on replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.


Corporate sovereignty, exit, jurisdictional competition or technological acceleration does not itself endorse foreign military projection. The retained coordinate models a chosen geopolitical variant; a rejection of democracy or an emphasis on profit is not independent evidence for aggression.

Our Dark Enlightenment model centers on replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

Our Dark Enlightenment model centers on replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.

Our Dark Enlightenment model centers on replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.

Corporate sovereignty, managerial competence or exit supplies the stated institutional core. Criticism of the academic-media Cathedral is not a claim for clerical government; the retained secular or mixed coordinate is a catalogue variant because these texts do not uniquely settle religion's public authority.

Our Dark Enlightenment model centers on replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.

Our Dark Enlightenment definition includes “replace democracy and egalitarianism with strong sovereigns, natural hierarchy and free microstates that speed up technology, beyond the Cathedral”. The accepted or rejected technological transformation matters; criticism of industrialization or limits on enhancement is not endorsement of unrestricted technological change.

Leans further toward autocracy than 96% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Representation is where it stands furthest from the rest.


On Power, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Kasumi directs Gehenna's Hot Springs Department with a single-minded commitment to developing geothermal sites. Her club stands firmly behind her, but her disregard for whatever obstructs construction has made her a wanted figure outside it.
Closest, by dimension



Other compatible profiles








The most distant
One of Trinity's principal factions and a successor to a founding academy. During the Eden Treaty crisis its members demand martial law and detain rivals; Mika's former leadership and later probation form part of its changing political history.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Far-Right
Current that advocates accelerating the system's contradictions through technology and the collapse of liberal institutions, betting on the rupture of the existing order to forge a new social and political hierarchy.
Current that rejects modern democracy and egalitarianism and proposes replacing them with hierarchical, efficient governments run like companies by a sovereign, combining traditionalism and technology.
Ideology of the slaveholding South that sustained the Confederacy, joining states' rights and secession, racial hierarchy and slavery, a patriarchal Christian agrarian society, free trade and militarism.
Closest in other spectrums
A doctrine of Curtis Yarvin that proposes running the state as a joint-stock company: shareholders, a sovereign CEO, citizens as customers who can leave, guaranteed private property and politics replaced by management.
A unitary variant of neoreaction: an absolute CEO-monarch rules a centralized state through data and security technology (surveillance, AI), under market capitalism, private property and free enterprise, for the sake of stability and efficiency.
A neoreactionary current that rejects democracy in favor of microstates run like firms. It favors competition among jurisdictions, free markets, the right of exit, and technological innovation as principles of government.
The most distant ideology
Green AnarchismAnarchist33%