Right-Wing Accelerationism
Current that advocates accelerating the system's contradictions through technology and the collapse of liberal institutions, betting on the rupture of the existing order to forge a new social and political hierarchy.
Home / Ideologies / Right-Wing Accelerationism
Current that advocates accelerating the system's contradictions through technology and the collapse of liberal institutions, betting on the rupture of the existing order to forge a new social and political hierarchy.
In one sentence
I want to accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins.
Political axes

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism definition includes “accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins”. Replacing central authority with voluntary communities is modeled toward the decentralized side; stateless association is not literally a federal state.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism model centers on accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism definition includes “accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins”. Order or hierarchy supplies a security-oriented context, but does not by itself quantify surveillance or repression.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism model centers on accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism model centers on accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.

Corporate sovereignty, exit, jurisdictional competition or technological acceleration does not itself endorse foreign military projection. The retained coordinate models a chosen geopolitical variant; a rejection of democracy or an emphasis on profit is not independent evidence for aggression.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism model centers on accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism definition includes “accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins”. Decentralized exchange and competition bear on market coordination; they need not imply unrestricted private ownership.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism model centers on accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.

Corporate sovereignty, managerial competence or exit supplies the stated institutional core. Criticism of the academic-media Cathedral is not a claim for clerical government; the retained secular or mixed coordinate is a catalogue variant because these texts do not uniquely settle religion's public authority.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism model centers on accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.

Our Right-Wing Accelerationism definition includes “accelerate the collapse of liberal institutions with technology and stateless markets, so a new hierarchy rises from the ruins”. Technology, industrial transformation or scientific organization is part of the stated project, while its ethical and ecological limits remain separate questions.

Leans further toward free market than 86% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Control is where it stands furthest from the rest.

On Morality, it sits close to the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Rabu leads the Splash Helmet Gang and has earned her followers' wholehearted trust. She keeps looking for ways to improve their lives, although bad luck repeatedly interferes with her efforts and leaves the gang improvising to get by.
Closest, by dimension



Other compatible profiles








The most distant
The Helmet Gang band led by Rabu, who protects her subordinates and treats them like siblings. Its members cause trouble, take paid jobs, and also seek ordinary schoolgirl recreation outside academy council structures.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Far-Right
A intellectual current of Nick Land and Curtis Yarvin that attacks democracy, egalitarianism and the academic-media "Cathedral", defends autocratic government and exit, and harbors strands of race realism and accelerationism.
Current that rejects modern democracy and egalitarianism and proposes replacing them with hierarchical, efficient governments run like companies by a sovereign, combining traditionalism and technology.
Ideology of the slaveholding South that sustained the Confederacy, joining states' rights and secession, racial hierarchy and slavery, a patriarchal Christian agrarian society, free trade and militarism.
Closest in other spectrums
A doctrine of Curtis Yarvin that proposes running the state as a joint-stock company: shareholders, a sovereign CEO, citizens as customers who can leave, guaranteed private property and politics replaced by management.
A neoreactionary current that rejects democracy in favor of microstates run like firms. It favors competition among jurisdictions, free markets, the right of exit, and technological innovation as principles of government.
Nietzschean current that rejects egalitarian morality as herd resentment, defending a hierarchy of values, the aristocratic creation of meaning and the tragic affirmation of life after the death of God.
The most distant ideology
CommunalismAnarchist35%