Revolutionary Syndicalism
Current that rejects the parliamentary and reformist path, betting on the general strike and the mobilising myth: direct union action and proletarian violence should destroy the state and the decadent bourgeoisie.
Home / Ideologies / Revolutionary Syndicalism
Current that rejects the parliamentary and reformist path, betting on the general strike and the mobilising myth: direct union action and proletarian violence should destroy the state and the decadent bourgeoisie.
In one sentence
I want the general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism.
Political axes

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism definition includes “without parliament or reformism”. The clause specifies a stance toward political authorization; an absent or rejected franchise, parliament or party is not evidence that the model endorses that institution.


Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism definition includes “current that rejects the parliamentary and reformist path, betting on the general strike and the mobilising myth: direct union action and proletarian violence should destroy the state and the decadent bourgeoisie”. The statement's use, rejection or limitation of force must be distinguished; a reference to violence inside a rejected claim is not evidence of pacifism or militarism by itself.


Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify coercive foreign projection into other peoples or states. This axis concerns foreign intervention, not nationalism, domestic regulation, cultural confidence or military preparedness alone.

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.

Our Revolutionary Syndicalism definition includes “without parliament or reformism”. The stance toward inherited or reformist customs matters; a critique of tradition or rejection of cultural progressivism is not an endorsement of the position being rejected.


Our Revolutionary Syndicalism model centers on general strike and direct union action to destroy the state and the bourgeoisie, without parliament or reformism. That core does not specify the priority given to technological transformation versus ecological or bodily limits. Historical age, rural life and scientific reasoning do not by themselves establish acceptance or rejection of all technology.

Leans further toward federal than 77% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Structure is where it stands furthest from the rest.

On Representation, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Minori leads Red Winter's Labor Party and organizes construction workers for fair pay and treatment. Her strikes challenge whoever holds power, including new leaders installed after a coup; solidarity and equality matter more to her than loyalty to a particular ruler.
Closest, by dimension



Other compatible profiles








The most distant
Red Winter's Public Works Department carries out construction and engineering projects under Minori. Its members press for equal treatment and better working conditions through strikes and demonstrations, including against leaders they previously helped.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Radical Left
Current that joins a state-run socialist economy and a strong party with patriotism, the traditional family, religion as national heritage and rejection of cultural progressivism, seeing identity politics as a liberal distraction from class struggle.
Variant of socialism developed in Tito's Yugoslavia, combining single-party rule and a cult of the leader with workers' self-management of enterprises, federal decentralization, market openness, and non-alignment between the Cold War blocs.
Mao's Chinese adaptation of Marxism, centered on the peasantry as the revolutionary force, protracted people's war, permanent mass mobilization, and cultural revolution against the party bureaucracy.
Closest in other spectrums
Project of a dynastic empire organized as a federation of nationalities, with regional autonomy, local parliaments and recognized languages, while retaining a hereditary crown, unified army and military assertion of imperial greatness.
Russian geopolitical current that sees Eurasia as a distinct civilization and proposes a Moscow-led continental bloc, with regional autonomy and shared strategic command, against Atlanticism and US hegemony.
Political project developed by Abdias Nascimento from the history of Brazil's quilombos. It advocates racial equality, Afro-Brazilian self-determination, participatory democracy, a cooperative economy and land held for collective use.
The most distant ideology
Crypto-AnarchismLibertarian35%