Eurasianism
Russian geopolitical current that sees Eurasia as a distinct civilization and proposes a Moscow-led continental bloc, with regional autonomy and shared strategic command, against Atlanticism and US hegemony.
Home / Ideologies / Eurasianism
Russian geopolitical current that sees Eurasia as a distinct civilization and proposes a Moscow-led continental bloc, with regional autonomy and shared strategic command, against Atlanticism and US hegemony.
In one sentence
I want Eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries.
Political axes

Our Eurasianism definition includes “regional autonomy and shared strategic command, against Atlanticism and US hegemony”. This clause must be read for which central institutions it retains or rejects; opposition to a state or party is not endorsement of centralized territorial power.

Our Eurasianism model centers on eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.

Our Eurasianism model centers on eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries. That core does not specify the permissible use of public coercion versus protected personal autonomy. The form of government does not alone establish the extent of surveillance, repression or civil liberty.

Our Eurasianism model centers on eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries. That core does not specify minority membership, migration and the coexistence of cultural identities. Shared economic interests or a universal philosophical ethic do not alone specify immigration or cultural-integration policy.

Our Eurasianism model centers on eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.

Our Eurasianism definition includes “economic sovereignty and planned essential industries”. Sovereignty and opposition to outside domination are relevant context, but do not alone settle whether the movement itself projects force abroad.

Our Eurasianism model centers on eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

Our Eurasianism model centers on eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.

Our Eurasianism definition includes “economic sovereignty and planned essential industries”. Sovereignty or locally rooted production supplies protection-oriented context, but specific tariff and capital rules remain model assumptions.

Our Eurasianism model centers on eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries. That core does not specify whether public rules and political authority are grounded in religious doctrine. Personal faith, atheism, religious identity and rejection of a state do not alone establish the source of public rules.

Our Eurasianism definition includes “regional autonomy and shared strategic command, against Atlanticism and US hegemony”. The stance toward inherited or reformist customs matters; a critique of tradition or rejection of cultural progressivism is not an endorsement of the position being rejected.

Our Eurasianism model centers on eurasian peoples autonomous in their traditions, united under Moscow's strategic direction, with economic sovereignty and planned essential industries. That core does not specify the priority given to technological transformation versus ecological or bodily limits. Historical age, rural life and scientific reasoning do not by themselves establish acceptance or rejection of all technology.

Leans further toward religious governance than 90% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Religion in governance is where it stands furthest from the rest.

On Trade, it sits close to the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Suzumi volunteered for the Vigilante Crew to protect Trinity students from attacks during their daily lives. Her commitment can make her seem severe, but people who get past that impression discover a friendly and considerate companion.
Closest, by dimension
Other compatible profiles








The most distant
Shanhaijing's governing office, led by Kisaki, enforces local rules and negotiates with its commercial organizations. Kisaki balances inherited customs with reforms and exchanges, while members of the office can resist changes they consider contrary to tradition.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Third Position
Anti-capitalist wing of National Socialism, linked to Gregor Strasser, which emphasized a mass nationalist socialism, nationalization, and social revolution within the movement, later crushed by Hitler.
Model that organizes society into corporations of workers and employers integrated into the state, seeking harmony between classes and directed economic cooperation instead of conflict or free competition.
Authoritarian nationalist movement that emerged in 1930s Brazil, with a Christian and corporatist base, the motto God, Fatherland and Family, mass aesthetics, and frontal opposition to liberalism and communism.
Closest in other spectrums
A Spanish current of counter-revolutionary traditionalism, born in the 19th-century Carlist Wars under the motto God, Fatherland, Fueros and King, advocating a legitimist Catholic monarchy, religious unity, regional fueros and an organic society against liberalism.
Ideology advocating the political unity of Muslims above national borders, around the ummah and the ideal of a caliphate, formulated by Jamal al-Din al-Afghani and adopted by Ottoman sultan Abdul Hamid II against European colonialism.
Current of Thomas Müntzer, the peasants of 1525 and guerrilla priests such as Camilo Torres, seeking the Kingdom of God on earth through revolution, with common property and the rule of the poor imposed by force.
The most distant ideology
Crypto-AnarchismLibertarian22%