Buddhist Nationalism
A current fusing ethnic identity and Theravada Buddhist faith, seeing the nation as guardian of the Dharma threatened by minorities, as in Sinhalese nationalism in Sri Lanka and the Ma Ba Tha and 969 monk movements in Myanmar.
Home / Ideologies / Buddhist Nationalism
A current fusing ethnic identity and Theravada Buddhist faith, seeing the nation as guardian of the Dharma threatened by minorities, as in Sinhalese nationalism in Sri Lanka and the Ma Ba Tha and 969 monk movements in Myanmar.
In one sentence
I want a Buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch.
Political axes

Our Buddhist Nationalism model centers on buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch. That core does not specify the constitutional allocation of power between territorial units and a center. Administrative centralization, social equality and opposition to the state are different claims from a federal constitution.


Our Buddhist Nationalism model centers on buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch. That core does not specify who can choose, replace and hold political decision-makers accountable. A social or economic objective does not by itself establish elections, popular sovereignty or an unelected ruling elite.

Our Buddhist Nationalism definition includes “influential monks, strong leaders”. Order or hierarchy supplies a security-oriented context, but does not by itself quantify surveillance or repression.

Our Buddhist Nationalism definition includes “a current fusing ethnic identity and Theravada Buddhist faith, seeing the nation as guardian of the Dharma threatened by minorities, as in Sinhalese nationalism in Sri Lanka and the Ma Ba Tha and 969 monk movements in Myanmar”. Membership defined by ancestry, exclusion or compulsory cultural integration bears on assimilation and unequal inclusion.

Our Buddhist Nationalism model centers on buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch. That core does not specify the political role of organized armed force and acceptance of war. Domestic coercion, economic state intervention and national pride do not by themselves establish militarism or pacifism.


Guarding Dharma and policing minorities describes the selected domestic national order. It does not alone establish coercive foreign action; the retained intervention coordinate is a catalogue geopolitical assumption, and Ashoka's restraint is a contrasting Buddhist tradition rather than proof of modern nationalism.


Our Buddhist Nationalism model centers on buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch. That core does not specify ownership of productive assets, land and enterprises. Welfare spending, moral solidarity and expert administration do not by themselves abolish or privatize productive ownership.

Our Buddhist Nationalism model centers on buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch. That core does not specify how production and allocation are coordinated through plans or decentralized exchange. Public ownership can coexist with markets, and private firms can operate under directed planning.

Our Buddhist Nationalism model centers on buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch. That core does not specify cross-border trade, capital flows and economic integration. Domestic market freedom and international cultural solidarity are different claims from a free-trade policy.

The definition assigns the nation a public duty to guard Dharma and gives monks political influence. That supports a religious-national public-order strand; Ashoka's coexistence edicts are a contrasting Buddhist political tradition, not proof of modern exclusionary nationalism.

Our Buddhist Nationalism model centers on buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch. That core does not specify public attitudes toward inherited customs, family, gender and social change. Economic redistribution, technological novelty and a religious affiliation do not uniquely determine every moral position.

Our Buddhist Nationalism model centers on buddhist nation that protects the Dharma and the majority, with influential monks, strong leaders, and minorities under watch. That core does not specify the priority given to technological transformation versus ecological or bodily limits. Historical age, rural life and scientific reasoning do not by themselves establish acceptance or rejection of all technology.

Leans further toward religious governance than 93% of the 250 ideologies in the catalog.
Of all the axes, Religion in governance is where it stands furthest from the rest.


On Economy, it sits practically at the catalog median.
Here it shares common ground with most ideologies.

Oki Aoi serves in the General Student Council and oversees financial administration. Exacting about budgets and procedure, she brings a disciplined approach to reviewing Schale and the council's accounts.
Closest, by dimension



Other compatible profiles








The most distant
Shanhaijing's governing office, led by Kisaki, enforces local rules and negotiates with its commercial organizations. Kisaki balances inherited customs with reforms and exchanges, while members of the office can resist changes they consider contrary to tradition.
Also close, by dimension
The most distant
Ideological proximity
Closest within Right
Current that unites traditional values, family, and religion with strong cultural nationalism, defending sovereignty, borders, and the people's identity within democracy, with clear distrust of globalism.
Current that combines popular sovereignty and democratic institutions with strong cultural nationalism, prioritizing the nation's interests and identity over supranational commitments and multiculturalism.
Ideology that places the nation as the central value, defending its sovereignty, unity, and identity, and prioritizing the interests of the people and the nation-state over external influences and globalism.
Closest in other spectrums
Project that seeks to organize state and society according to the strict interpretation of a religious doctrine, subordinating laws, customs, and politics to sacred precepts and rejecting modern secularism.
Russian geopolitical current that sees Eurasia as a distinct civilization and proposes a Moscow-led continental bloc, with regional autonomy and shared strategic command, against Atlanticism and US hegemony.
Doctrine of the rule of the best, entrusting power to a minority qualified by virtue, education or birth, rejecting political equality and majority rule as surrendering the city to incompetence.
The most distant ideology
Crypto-AnarchismLibertarian23%